从近10年的考题来看,逻辑衔接题的比重加大,尤其是近3年,表现得更加明显。这就对考生从整体上把握文章的内容,注意句际间的关系提出了更高的要求。
例:
More families consist of one parent households or two working parents; children are likely to have less supervision at home than was common in the traditional family structure.(200434)
[A] contrarily[B] consequently[C] similarly[D] simultaneously
空前“更多的单亲家庭和双亲就业家庭”与空后“孩子们受到较少的监管”有明显的因果关系,consequently“因此,所以,结果”,故选[B]。[A] contrarily“相反地”;[C] similarly“类似地,同样地”;[D] simultaneously“同时发生地”,均与上下文语义不符。对于逻辑衔接词的选择,虽可以从句法的角度进行判断,但考查的实质是上下文中的逻辑关系。