马登DSE培训机构
给你专业的教学
快速咨询来源:教育联展网 编辑:蓝七七 发布时间:2019-08-09
DSE香港中学文凭考试,那么在备考的学生找一个培训机构是很有必要的,那哪家DSE培训机构比较好呢?小编推荐深圳马登教育,马登教育专注于为内地学子赴港读书、就业、移民提供专业咨询及教学服务 。以下是小编整理相关DSE培训机构资料,仅供参考
马登国际教育是一家专注于香港DSE、雅思、托福培训及国外游学的一流港式教育机构,同时也是深圳第一家DSE状元机构。总部位于香港铜锣湾一带,截止2018年12月,我们已经帮助180名学生入读剑桥、牛津、哈佛等**学府;超过1300名学生被世界百强高校录取。多年来,我们一直致力于让更多的孩子在提升自我眼界和能力的关键时期——大学阶段,能够享受到国际化高质量教育,让孩子成长为更符合国际发展需要的综合性人才,迎接新时代的挑战,在未来多变的社会破格而出。
校区实行小班制教学,采用“竞争学习”与“个性化辅导”相结合的教学形式,与学生高效互动,有的放矢。为每一位学生的成长提供**质、最有针对性的支持。在马登,孩子将在诸位最能考、最会教、最懂DSE老师的亲自带领下,实现成绩和人格发展的双重蜕变。我们已经亲自指导上千名孩子进入世界顶尖、世界百强的学府。这些丰富、宝贵的择校经验同样也将为你保驾护航,结合马登特有的“香港高考一条龙服务”,全力帮助每一位孩子走进国际一流**。
学生很容易入到香港三大, 以及DSE对内地学生报考及升学没有任何限制。很容易考是因为可以除了英文外所有科目用中文应考,中文科亦可普通话进行考试, 而且只是跟香港学生竞争比较,试卷亦比中国高考简单,所以内地学生很有先天优势。。
因为DSE是国际认可的,英美澳加基本上所有大学都接受DSE 成绩,但不接受中国高考成绩。哈佛牛津也会受DSE成绩申请本科,但在国内高考考得很好也很难出国。。
2018年DSE考试人数跌破六万人,要取得好成绩只会越来越容易。因为DSE考试成绩是跟香港人的表现比较的,中文科及数学科已经比国内高考容易一倍以上,通识科有大量关于中国的题目,基本上不用温习,表现会比大部分香港学生好,理综科也是比国内高考容易的。
DSE全科 马登教育校长
DSE物理、化学马登首席老师
DSE全科马登教育创办人
香港DSE考试,你也许会问,内地生源需要符合什么资格才能报考香港DSE的中学文凭试?是否只要是内地生都可以报考?据香港考试及评核局给出的答复,学校考生以及自修生均可报考文凭试,其中学校考生是指学生为已获批准参加当年香港DSE中学文凭试之注册学校之中六正读生,并在该校之注册地址上课,换言之即是指绝大部分的香港日校学生;而在自修生当中,符合以下三种条件中的任意一种亦可报考文凭试:
1:曾应考香港中学文凭试,或相等考试;
2:.以每年1月1日计算,已足19岁;
3:非修读香港中学文凭考试课程,但于考试前一年已修毕或正在修读等同中六之课程。显然,对于内地高中生而言第一种和第二种条件均不符合,但第三条却是适用于中国内地所有完成高三课程的学生,因此内地生是具备充足的资格并可以以自修生的方式报考香港的文凭试的。
香港中学文凭试与内地高考比较
2020年香港中学文凭试(DSE)
通识:两卷 (资料回应题、延伸回应题)
选修科:中国文学丶英国文学丶历史丶中国历史丶经济丶生物丶化学、物理丶组合科学丶 地理、设计与应用科技丶健康管理与社会
关怀丶企业丶会计与财务概论等
每科满分:5** (7分)
考试费:每科港币619元(语文)或414元(其他科目) (自修生需另付港币475元报名费)
内地高考
通识:/
选修科:文科综合(历史丶地理丶政治) 或理科综合(物理、化学丶生物)
每科满分:中英数各150分、还修科300分
考试费:每科人民币175元至200元不等(广东省)
DSE报名时间
每年的9月份开始接受报名,直至12月为止。报考DSE的学生必须提供高一、高二成绩证明、高三在读证明。即使未满19岁,只要能提供成绩及在读证明即可报名。。
什么时候开始考试?
DSE(香港中学文凭考试)的考试时间在每年3月底至5月中为止,考试将持续进行一个多月。持续一个多月的意思并不是每天都要考试,而是考一天试将会休息数天至数星期不等,直至下一科考试。
港籍考生将会通过 JUPAS (大学联合招生系统)报读香港各大学,考生可于11至12月于JUPAS选择心仪的大学专业。如港生想报读内地大学,将可于3月参加「收生计划」,以DSE成绩直接报考内地高校, 当中包括北大、清华、复旦、中山等各大重点大学。。
本文整理了雅思阅读经济类词汇供大家参考使用,预祝各位考生在雅思阅读考试中取得优异的成绩! Immigrant networks are a rare bright spark in the world economy. Rich countries should welcome them THIS is not a good time to be foreign. Anti-immigrant parties are gaining ground in Europe. Britain has been fretting this week over lapses in its border controls. In America Barack Obama has failed to deliver the immigration reform he promised , and Republican presidential candidates would rather electrify the border fence with Mexico than educate the children of illegal aliens. America educates foreign scientists in its universities and then expels them, a policy the mayor of New York calls "national suicide". This illiberal turn in attitudes to migration is no surprise. It is the result of cyclical economic gloom combined with a secular rise in pressure on rich countries’ borders. But governments now weighing up whether or not to try to slam the door should consider another factor: the growing economic importance of diasporas, and the contribution they can make to a country’s economic growth. Old networks, new communications Diaspora networks—of Huguenots, Scots, Jews and many others—have always been a potent economic force, but the cheapness and ease of modern travel has made them larger and more numerous than ever before. There are now 215m first-generation migrants around the world: that’s 3% of the world’s population. If they were a nation, it would be a little larger than Brazil. There are more Chinese people living outside China than there are French people in France. Some 22m Indians are scattered all over the globe. Small concentrations of ethnic and linguistic groups have always been found in surprising places—Lebanese in west Africa, Japanese in Brazil and Welsh in Patagonia, for instance—but they have been joined by newer ones, such as west Africans in southern China. These networks of kinship and language make it easier to do business across borders. They speed the flow of information: a Chinese trader in Indonesia who spots a gap in the market for cheap umbrellas will alert his cousin in Shenzhen who knows someone who runs an umbrella factory. Kinship ties foster trust, so they can seal the deal and get the umbrellas to Jakarta before the rainy season ends. Trust matters, especially in emerging markets where the rule of law is weak. So does a knowledge of the local culture. That is why so much foreign direct investment in China still passes through the Chinese diaspora. And modern communications make these networks an even more powerful tool of business. Diasporas also help spread ideas. Many of the emerging world’s brightest minds are educated at Western universities. An increasing number go home, taking with them both knowledge and contacts. Indian computer scientists in Bangalore bounce ideas constantly off their Indian friends in Silicon Valley. China’s technology industry is dominated by "sea turtles" (Chinese who have lived abroad and returned). Diasporas spread money, too. Migrants into rich countries not only send cash to their families; they also help companies in their host country operate in their home country. A Harvard Business School study shows that American companies that employ lots of ethnic Chinese people find it much easier to set up in China without a joint venture with a local firm. Such arguments are unlikely to make much headway against hostility towards immigrants in rich countries. Fury against foreigners is usually based on two (mutually incompatible) notions: that because so many migrants claim welfare they are a drain on the public purse; and that because they are prepared to work harder for less pay they will depress the wages of those at the bottom of the pile. The first is usually not true (in Britain, for instance, immigrants claim benefits less than indigenous people do), and the second is hard to establish either way. Some studies do indeed suggest that competition from unskilled immigrants depresses the wages of unskilled locals. But others find this effect to be small or non-existent. Nor is it possible to establish the impact of migration on overall growth. The sums are simply too difficult. Yet there are good reasons for believing that it is likely to be positive. Migrants tend to be hard-working and innovative. That spurs productivity and company formation. A recent study carried out by Duke University showed that, while immigrants make up an eighth of America’s population, they founded a quarter of the country’s technology and engineering firms. And, by linking the West with emerging markets, diasporas help rich countries to plug into fast-growing economies. Rich countries are thus likely to benefit from looser immigration policy; and fears that poor countries will suffer as a result of a "brain drain" are overblown. The prospect of working abroad spurs more people to acquire valuable skills, and not all subsequently emigrate. Skilled migrants send money home, and they often return to set up new businesses. One study found that unless they lose more than 20% of their university graduates, the brain drain makes poor countries richer. Indian takeaways Government as well as business gains from the spread of ideas through diasporas. Foreign-educated Indians, including the prime minister, Manmohan Singh (Oxford and Cambridge) and his sidekick Montek Ahluwalia (Oxford), played a big role in bringing economic reform to India in the early 1990s. Some 500,000 Chinese people have studied abroad and returned, mostly in the past decade; they dominate the think-tanks that advise the government, and are moving up the ranks of the Communist Party. Cheng Li of the Brookings Institution, an American think-tank, predicts that they will be 15-17% of its Central Committee next year, up from 6% in 2002. Few sea turtles call openly for democracy. But they have seen how it works in practice, and they know that many countries that practise it are richer, cleaner and more stable than China. As for the old world, its desire to close its borders is understandable but dangerous. Migration brings youth to ageing countries, and allows ideas to circulate in millions of mobile minds. That is good both for those who arrive with suitcases and dreams and for those who should welcome them.
今日已有25人申请,本月限额500名